Project File |
Mn1Cstorage.rsproj
|
Categories |
- Minimum Flow Requirement Node
|
Created By |
Linda |
Created Date |
03/02/2015 |
Tested By |
Linda |
Tested Date |
03/02/2015 |
Maintained By |
|
Additional Details |
Rate specified with Expression Editor same as Mn1C however the expression points to storage upstream flow rather than inflow node downstream flow.
Updated by juanita in May 2013 to accommodate changes that happened when 'End of Time Step' evaluation was moved to after values have been recorded.
Note: the .xcl spreadsheet referred to below is missing - it seems to have disappeared somewhere during the life of this test....
Lili Zhang: 29/07/2014, changed categories.
|
Model Information |
|
Output |
|
Functionality |
|
Specification |
|
Created In |
2.1.2 |
Last Saved In |
3.4.1.134 |
Works In Flow Phase |
|
Test Objective |
Minimum Flow requirement - Rate implemented correctly?
|
Status |
|
Team City Result |
Passed
|
Execution Time (Minutes) |
Days: 0, Hours: 0, Minutes: 0, Seconds: 40
|
Jira Issues |
|
Additional Files |
Scenario 2_Summary.csv, |
LogFile |
Mn1Cstorage.rsproj.txt
|
Scenarios |
Scenario Name: Scenario 2
- Description:
- Ordering System Type: Multiple Supply Path Solver
- OwnerShip Enabled: False
- Time Step: Monthly
- Simulation Start: 1/1/2005 12:00:00 AM
- Simulation End: 5/1/2007 12:00:00 AM
- Catchments: 0
- FunctionalUnits:
- Rainfall Runoff Model:
- Filtering Model:
- Links:
- Straight-Through Routing: 3
- Nodes:
- Inflow: 1
- Gauge: 1
- Storage: 1
- Minimum Flow Requirement: 1
- Constituent To Models:
|