Project File |
I3F.rsproj
|
Categories |
- River Management Inflow Node
- Ownership
|
Created By |
Linda |
Created Date |
03/02/2015 |
Tested By |
|
Tested Date |
03/02/2015 |
Maintained By |
|
Additional Details |
test passing up of total demand through inflow node where demand nodes have different lags
Lili Zhang: updated storage as node to accommodate no one can use storage as links in source.
|
Model Information |
|
Output |
|
Functionality |
|
Specification |
|
Created In |
0.12.1 |
Last Saved In |
3.5.0.682 |
Works In Flow Phase |
Yes |
Test Objective |
Inflow
|
Status |
|
Team City Result |
Passed
|
Execution Time (Minutes) |
Days: 0, Hours: 0, Minutes: 0, Seconds: 38
|
Jira Issues |
|
Additional Files |
I3F_solution.xls, Scenario 1_Summary.csv, |
LogFile |
I3F.rsproj.txt
|
Scenarios |
Scenario Name: Scenario 1
- Description:
- Ordering System Type: Multiple Supply Path Solver
- OwnerShip Enabled: False
- Time Step: Daily
- Simulation Start: 1/27/1971 12:00:00 AM
- Simulation End: 2/20/1971 12:00:00 AM
- Catchments: 0
- FunctionalUnits:
- Rainfall Runoff Model:
- Filtering Model:
- Links:
- Straight-Through Routing: 7
- Lagged Flow Routing: 1
- Nodes:
- Inflow: 2
- Gauge: 2
- Supply Point: 2
- Water User: 2
- Storage: 1
- Constituent To Models:
|