...
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Note: If the routing division is using an attenuation factor x=0 (i.e. | ), equation (23) can be rearranged to the continuous stirred reactor equation (equation (46)). This means that for fully forward weighted routing schemes, proportional routing is the same as fully-mixed.
...
Firstly, a modified high flow threshold is defined that applies to the owners, j (where j is defined in Table 2, and the relevant owners are those that have, with LossHF=0, a trial value of Storage(o,t) such that Storage(o,t) > StoragedsMAX(o) + StorageHFTRatioHFT(o)):
Equation 27 |
---|
where:
j Owners: LossHF(j) ≠ 0 is set-builder notation to indicate that the modified high flow threshold is the sum of all the owners’ shares of the threshold where the high flow loss is not going to be zero.
Next, it is necessary to determine the total volume of water this time step belonging to owners that are not contributing to the high flow loss, i.e. Storageexclude:
Equation 28 |
---|
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Note: in equation (28), j refers to owners whose current storage does not contribute to the high flow loss. |
The denominator of equation (26) (current live volume contributing to high flow loss) is then:
Equation 29 |
---|
Equation (26) can now be recast in terms of the total volume in the division:
Equation 30 |
---|
Rearranged:
Equation 31 |
---|
High flow loss solutions over a time-step
Case of Muskingum weighting x = 1 (Index flow rate = Inflow)
In this case, the index flow rate is the same as the inflow rate, and an owner’s share of inflow will determine their share of active storage. The proportional routing formula (equation (19)) can be rewritten and applied to inflow as shown in equation (32), below and then rearranged to determine the owner’s share of storage.